top of page

Recommendations

1 page
3 pages
15 pages

Values

EndSaR recommends that the state of Michigan establish values regarding seclusion and restraint in schools, similar to the shared values that were established by US Secretary of Education, Miguel A. Cardona, in his recent letter to state and school leaders.  Values can act as guiding principles both in establishing system level processes and in individual decision making within the classroom as difficult situations arise.​

​​

These values should be communicated in an opening statement in Michigan's seclusion and restraint law (MCL 380.1307) to act as a justification for the law, essentially establishing the "why."

​

EndSaR recommends the following opening statement:

​

"The state of Michigan acknowledges that the use of involuntary seclusion and emergency physical restraint are physically dangerous to students and staff because they may involve physical struggling, pressure to the chest, or other interruptions to breathing and students have died as the result of being restrained by trained professionals.  The state further acknowledges that the use of involuntary seclusion and emergency physical restraint are psychologically dangerous because individuals have been severely traumatized and/or retraumatized during seclusion or restraint and it is impossible for staff to observe whether or not a student is having an experience that will result in trauma symptoms.  In addition, involuntary seclusion and emergency physical restraint can deteriorate relationships between students and staff, make it more difficult for students and staff to feel safe in school, and lead to increased behavioral problems, all of which are barriers to students’ ability to access their education.  Therefore, involuntary seclusion and emergency physical restraint can never be considered entirely safe.  Furthermore, the use of seclusion or emergency physical restraint, even once, can result in a denial of a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE).  For those reasons, extreme effort must be put into creating school environments in which students and staff feel safe and their physical, psychological, social, and emotional needs are met in order to prevent the crisis situations that tend to lead to the use of involuntary seclusion, emergency physical restraint, and other forms of exclusionary discipline.  

 

For the reasons stated above, the use of involuntary seclusion shall be considered unlawful and the use of emergency physical restraint shall be considered unsafe and should be exceptionally rare."

Accountability

Michigan seclusion and restraint law states, "A person who fails to comply with this section or who fails to comply with any of the requirements of the state policy developed under this section is considered to have failed to comply with and to have violated this act."  Too often, educators enter an extremely difficult and atypical situation without the required education, experience, training, or support from the system to be successful.  When violations have occurred, individual educators have their positions terminated and receive personal consequences, but what about the rest of the system? 

​

​

 

 

 

 

 

 

All data is from mischooldata.org/districtschool-data-files Michigan’s Center for Educational Performance and Information, Use of Seclusion and Restraint: ISD School Year Totals from multiple years (accessed August 28, 2024).

 

The misuse and overuse of seclusion and restraint in Michigan is a symptom of a deeper problem with the greater system.  While current legislation considers the potential of an individual to violate the law, it is important to recognize that any individual person is operating within a system whose decision making and cultural beliefs create the circumstances in which the law is likely to be upheld or violated.  This system includes our schools, districts, intermediate school districts (ISD), teacher preparation programs, state departments of education, and federal law and guidance.

 

Educators deserve be adequately prepared, guided, and supported to be successful in the positions to which they are assigned.  When student needs are not adequately met, it's not just a failure of the individual educator, but also of the administrators, the school board, the district, and the ISD, the teacher preparation programs, cultural norms, and the entire system upon which these entities rely.   

​

EndSaR recommends that we:

  • Hold the entire system accountable for complying with Michigan law.

  • Require teacher preparation programs to teach approved approaches.

  • Create and maintain the following tools specific to seclusion and restraint:

    • Virtual basic awareness training; available to the public for free

    • Virtual data collection training

    • Electronic real-time reporting form for schools

    • Rubric for evaluating approaches; renewed annually

    • List of approved approaches; updated annually

    • Parent document

    • List of approved less restrictive interventions

    • Electronic complaint form available online to the public

    • Detailed guidance and support resources

    • Statewide network of educator support for department approved approaches

    • Effective corrective action process for schools that are not meeting expectations

S&R Graph 2017-2024.png

Parent Document 

Michigan law requires that parents be informed when their student has been secluded or restrained, and that they are invited to participate in a debriefing meeting.  Informing parents after the fact is too late.  Many parents report that the first time they become aware that these tactics were even used in schools is when they are informed that their student was secluded or restrained.  Often, parents don't have the context to fully understand what their child has been through when school staff inform them that their child, "went to the red zone today," "was taken to the time away room," "spent time in the calm zone," or "had to be held."  Parents and families deserve to understand the tactics, as well as the severe consequences that they can have, before they are used on their child so that they can be proactive in helping to prevent the situations that tend to lead to their use.

 

EndSaR recommends that the state produce a document for parents and families to understand the Michigan laws and federal guidance around seclusion and restraint.  Schools must be required to offer a physical or electronic copy of the parent document to: 

  • All parents or guardians at the beginning of every school year

  • All team members at every IEP Team and 504 Team meeting

  • Parents or guardians every time a student is secluded or restrained

The parent document should include:

  • Brief overview of Michigan laws and where to find the complete laws online

  • Brief overview of federal guidance and where to find the complete guidance online

  • Notification that the experience of being secluded or restrained is potentially traumatic

    • Explanation of what elements of the experience cause it to be potentially traumatic

    • Long term impacts of trauma on children

    • Examples of what kinds of behaviors may appear or increase after a traumatic experience

    • How to identify trauma symptoms

    • What kind of mental health supports & therapy can help with trauma in children

  • What questions to ask of the school to fully understand their child’s experience

  • Resources for finding out more information

  • Instructions for filing a complaint if they believe laws or guidance were not properly followed

Clarity

Michigan seclusion and restraint law (MCL 380.1307) states, "It is the intent of the legislature that sections 1307 to 1307h shall provide for a uniform policy regarding the use of seclusion and restraint in the public schools that accomplishes the following objectives: d) Clearly defines the terms "seclusion", "restraint", "emergency seclusion", and "emergency physical restraint" and clearly states the procedures for the use of emergency seclusion and emergency physical restraint."

​

However, those who are expected to follow this law have stated that:

  • "The law regarding the use of seclusion and restraint in classrooms is vague and hard to understand.​"

  • "There is not sufficient training or awareness for teachers and administrators regarding the psychological and emotional trauma caused by seclusion and restraint."

  • "The guidelines produced by MDE is not thorough enough."

  • "There are places where objective and subjective qualities are mixed together, some of which cannot be known by the teacher or administrator like (1307c(c))." 

    • What is considered "imminent risk to the safety of the pupil or to the safety of others?​"

    • What is "a manner that, based on research and evidence, is safe, appropriate, and proportionate to and sensitive to the pupil's severity of behavior, chronological and developmental age, physical size, gender, physical condition, medical condition, psychiatric condition, and personal history, including any history of physical or sexual abuse or other trauma"?

  • "The definition of seclusion is incomplete."

 

The US Department of Education Office of Civil rights collects a range of information, including incidents of restraint and seclusion of public school children, in the Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) which is compiled and released in a report called "Student Discipline and School Climate in U.S. Public Schools."  

​

For the purpose of consistency and clarity, â€‹EndSaR suggests that Michigan uses the CRDC definitions of restraint and seclusion with slight modifications, redefines emergency situation, uses the existing definition of serious physical injury, and adds definitions of necessary brief hold restraint, unnecessary restraint, extended restraint, full restraint, gentle escort, restraint escort, solitary seclusion, isolated seclusion, time out, voluntary sensory gyms, and voluntary calming spaces:

​

Serious physical injury means an injury that— (A) is life threatening; (B) results in permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure; or (C) necessitates medical or surgical intervention to preclude permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure.     

  • US Code has a legal definition of serous physical injury (42 USC § 247d-6d(i)(10)).

  • The US Department of Education recommends that seclusion and restraint only be used when behavior poses an "imminent danger of serious physical harm to self or others."

​

Seclusion refers to the involuntary confinement of a student in a room or area, with or without adult supervision, from which the student is not permitted to leave. Students who believe or are told by a school staff member that they are not able to leave a room or area, should be considered secluded.

* This includes requiring a student to stay for an adult-designated period of time or requiring them to complete a compliance demand before being permitted to leave (like being quiet for 5 minutes or making an apology) *.  The term does not include a classroom or school environment where, as a general rule, all students need permission to leave to room or area such as to use the restroom and does not include allowing students to access a sensory gym, voluntary calming space, or a break or a walk with a supportive adult. 

  • This definition is based on the CRDC definition with the following modifications:

    • * The statement within the astricts was added for clarity. *​

    • The statement in italic was changed from "; a behavior management technique that is part of an approved program, which involves the monitored separation of a student in an unlocked setting, from which the student is allowed to leave; or placing a student in a separate location within a classroom with others or with an instructor, so long as the student has the same opportunity to receive and engage in instruction" because we defined "sensory gym" and "voluntary calming space" to cover this situation in greater detail.

​

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction, imposed by a school staff member or other individual, that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move their torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a gentle escort. *x* Encouraging, inducing, or forcing a student to walk to a safe location in a way that involves methods utilized to maintain physical control of a student should be considered a physical restraint.

  • This definition is consistent with the CRDC definition with the following modifications:​

    • The following statement was removed from the *x* location for the purpose of adding it as a separate definition, "Physical escort includes a touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder, or back of a student for the purpose of inducing a student to walk to a safe location, when the contact does not continue after arriving at the safe location.​

    • The term in italics was changed from physical to gentle to distinguish between the two types of escort; gentle and restraint.

​

Necessary, brief-hold restraint is the only lawful use of restraint in schools and is defined as a brief hold necessary to prevent serious physical injury such as to break up a fight, stop a physical assault as defined in MCL 380.1310(b), take a weapon from a pupil, or prevent an impulsive behavior that threatens a pupil’s immediate safety, such as running in front of a car or banging their head against a brick wall.​

​

Extended restraint is a restraint that is not brief meaning that it lasts longer than 5 minutes or longer than is necessary to break up a fight, stop a physical assault, take a weapon, or prevent a dangerous, impulsive behavior. 

 

Gentle escort means gently touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder, or back of a student for the purpose of inducing a student to walk to a safe location, when the contact does not continue after arriving at the safe location.​ 

​

Restraint escort means encouraging, inducing, or forcing a student to walk to a safe location in a way that involves methods utilized to maintain physical control of a student.  Restraint escorts are traumatic, unnecessary restraints and are prohibited in Michigan schools.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Full restraint means a personal restriction, imposed by a school staff member or other individual, that simultaneously immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move their torso, arms, legs, and head freely. Full restraints are traumatic, unnecessary restraints and are prohibited in Michigan schools.

​

​

​

​

​

​​

 

 

 

 

 

Emergency situation means a situation in which a pupil's behavior poses imminent risk of serious physical injury to the individual pupil or of serious physical injury to others. ​

  • This definition is consistent with the US Department of Education statement, replacing "harm" with "injury" to provide a legal definition (MCL 324.20139).

​​

​Isolated seclusion means the involuntary confinement of a student in a room or other space, separated from peers, from which the student is not permitted to leave. 

​

Solitary seclusion means the involuntary confinement of a student in a room or other space, alone or without the ability the engage with an attentive, responsive adult, from which the student is not permitted to leave. 

​​

Time out is a term that is used to mean a range of different things from a much needed break to the unlawful seclusion of students.  Time outs that are imposed upon a student by an adult (involuntary) and the student is prevented from leaving meet the definition of seclusion are prohibited.  Time outs that allow students access to a sensory gym, voluntary calming space, a walk or a break with an attentive, regulated adult who can offer co-regulation and assess the need for increased support can be a healthy use of time out or time in.

​​

Voluntary Sensory gym is a sensory rich environment with specialized equipment designed to stimulate a child’s senses and vestibular and proprioception systems, improve bodily awareness, motor skills, communication, social skills, and that feels regulating to a child whose body needs to move throughout the day in order to stay regulated.  Access to a sensory gym is not a reward for compliance or desired behaviors, but rather a necessary accommodation in order to meet students' needs and thus prevent extreme behavior.  Access to a sensory gym should be built in to schedule of student who need them and the schedule should remain flexible to allow access as needed to prevent escalation, especially during difficult days.

​

Voluntary calming space is a place where students who are feeling stressed, overwhelmed, or emotionally dysregulated in the standard educational environments can go to receive co-regulation or practice self-regulation and from which they can leave freely through a clearly open exit.  Voluntary calming spaces require a trained adult who can engage as necessary and assess the need for increased support.  Voluntary calming spaces can be within the classroom where a student can access activities and instruction with their peers or they can be outside of the classroom setting.  Voluntary calming spaces must include comforting elements such as soft seating, soft lighting, options for students to choose from to calm their nervous systems such as snacks, headphones for listening to calm music, coloring pages, fidgets, Legos and posters with guidance for practicing regulation skills.  Adults may invite students, but cannot force them, to go to or stay in a voluntary calming space, cannot demand that they go, or threaten punishment or consequence if they don’t go, and they cannot be used as a punishment or consequence. Access to a voluntary calming space is not a reward for compliance or desired behaviors, but rather a necessary accommodation in order to meet students' needs and thus prevent extreme behavior.  Access to a voluntary calming space can be built in to schedule of student who need them and the schedule should remain flexible to allow access as needed to prevent escalation, especially during difficult days.

Interim Control and Transport Positions.png
Team Control Positon.png
Children's Control Position.png

Rubric

Michigan seclusion and restraint law states that "It is the intent of the legislature that sections 1307 to 1307h shall provide for a uniform policy regarding the use of seclusion and restraint in the public schools that accomplishes the following objectives: (a) Promotes the care, safety, welfare, and security of the school community and the dignity of each pupil, (b) Encourages the use of proactive, effective, evidence- and research-based strategies and best practices to reduce the occurrence of challenging behaviors, eliminate the use of seclusion and restraint, and increase meaningful instructional time for all pupils."

 

In order to ensure that the intent of the law be recognized, the department shall assemble a team of experts and stakeholders including school employees, school board members, administrators, students who have experienced seclusion or restraint, parents, child advocates, pediatric psychologists, occupational therapists, and disability rights advocates.  This team shall create a rubric for evaluating approaches and maintain a list of department approved proactive, effective, evidence- and research-based approaches that can be used to reduce the occurrence of challenging behaviors, eliminate the use of seclusion and restraint, and increase meaningful instructional time for all pupils.  The department shall work with a similar team of experts and stakeholders to review and update the rubric and the list annually. 

 

EndSaR recommends that the rubric include requirements that the approaches be trauma assumed, neuroscience aligned, neurodiversity affirming, relationship based, collaborative, equitable, and research and evidence based approaches that schools can choose from to implement at various levels of support.

​

Trauma Assumed: Awareness of the prevalence and impacts of trauma, the factors of experiences that are likely to result in trauma (helplessness, hopelessness, loss of autonomy), the factors that help stressful situations from becoming traumatic (support through a trusting adult relationships), and how trauma manifests in student interactions.  When extreme behavior is observed, it is assumed that trauma is at play.  All approaches must be trauma-informed.  Forced seclusion and solitary confinement are not a trauma-informed approaches.


Neuroscience Aligned: Informed by the polyvagal theory and the impacts of nervous system states on functioning.  The use of co-regulation by regulated adult nervous systems when students are unable to self-regulate.

 

Neurodiversity Affirming:  Individual differences are celebrated and respected. Education plans and environments are changed to fit the needs of the student, not the other way around.  Anti-ableist; not tolerating discrimination in favor of able bodied and neurotypical people.  Assuring access to regulating activities for those who need them (movement, fidgeting, doodling, breaks, Legos, etc.).

​

Relationship Based: Prioritizing building and maintaining safe and trusting relationships between adults and children; relationships are prioritized above academic and compliance demands.


Collaborative: Problem solving with others, including the vulnerable student(s) and their allies and parents/guardians.  Listening to the student's perspective, validating their feelings, and solving the problem with their input and in a way that allows for their success.

​

Equitable: Everyone gets their needs met in a way that offsets the power differential meaning that those with more power, experience, and resources take more responsibility to change.  Everybody considers their part in the situation including the adults, the environment, and the systems.  â€‹â€‹

Approved Approaches

In addition to the requirement listed above from Michigan seclusion and restraint law (MCL 380.1307) which requires the identification of approved approaches, Michigan corporal punishment law (MCL 380.1312) states, "The department shall develop a model list of alternatives to the use of corporal punishment. This model list shall be developed in consultation with organizations that represent the interests of teachers, school employees, school boards, school administrators, pupils, parents, and child advocates, plus any other organization that the state board of education may wish to consult."

​

Michigan Departmet of Education (MDE) currently has a model list of alternatives, but the list is outdated and does not reflect the advances in trauma and educational neuroscience research that has taken place since 1992. 

​

The list of approved approaches that we are requesting to eliminate seclusion and reduce the need for restraint in schools would overlap entirely with approaches that are alternatives to corporal punishment.  Educators are entitled a list that is kept current.​​​

Solve the Underlying Problem

Michigan seclusion and restraint law states, "If a pupil exhibits a pattern of behavior that poses a substantial risk of creating an emergency situation in the future that could result in the use of emergency seclusion or emergency physical restraint, school personnel are encouraged to do all of the following: (i) Conduct a functional behavioral assessment." (FBA)

​

The intention of this part of the law is to identify the function (purpose), of the behavior so that an intervention plan can be created to help the student get their needs met in a more acceptable way.  

 

In the process of conducting an FBA, the first step is to gather data.  Educators identify the antecedent (what happened right before or the trigger), the behavior, and the consequence (what happened right after or the impact) and record them on an antecedent, behavior, consequence (ABC) data sheet.  One big problem with the ABC data sheets, is that there are only 5 possible functions listed for educators to choose; gain access to attention, gain access to a tangible item or activity, escape from a demand, or gain access to sensory input.  These are extremely limited and are do not reflect the latest discoveries about the neuroscience of behavior.  

​

While conducting an FBA can still be helpful, there are other evidence based tools for identifying the function of a behavior such as the Assessment of Skills and Unsolved Problems (ASUP), the Why Toolkit, and the Collaborative and Proactive Solutions Assessment Planning Tool (CPS-APT).  Schools should have the option of choosing between the 4 tools based on the approach that their school has adopted.

Data

Michigan seclusion and restraint law states, "Incidents of use shall, at a minimum, be reported by race, age, grade, gender, disability status, medical condition, identity of the school personnel initiating the use of the restraint or seclusion, and identity of the school or program where the use occurred." and "The department shall make available redacted, aggregate data on the reported use of seclusion and restraint, compiled by school district, public school academy, and intermediate school district on a quarterly basis."

​

However, only the number of seclusions, number of restraints, number of students secluded or restrained, and whether or not the student has a disability is shown in the data that is made available to the public.  When people have requested further data, they have been charged exorbitant amounts to receive the redacted data, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars.

​​​

In addition, the law states, "The data should be analyzed by the school and school district, public school academy, or intermediate school district in which the pupil is enrolled to determine the efficacy of the school's schoolwide system of behavioral support," "in the context of attendance, suspension, expulsion, and dropout data," and "for the purposes of continuous improvement of training and technical assistance toward the elimination of seclusion and restraint."

​

It seems that few schools have actually analyzed their seclusion and restraint data to this extent or in these contexts. 

​

For this reason, EndSaR teamed up with Michigan Public Health Institute to propose a data project called "Do No Harm" to make the data on seclusion and restraint in Michigan much more visible to residents of communities where it is happening, as well as help communities introduce other approaches that support both student as well as staff well-being.

​

The project has three primary components. First, there would be an establishment of a data quality
initiative which would study the existing data collection/reporting protocols of 3-5 school districts.
Second, developing and providing comprehensive training that demonstrates the impact of
seclusion and restraint on students and staff, and third, maintaining a state-level and local level
quality assurance plans that supports local efforts to reduce and eliminate the use of seclusion
and restraint in Michigan education settings. 

​

EndSaR recommends that Michigan funds the "Do No Harm" data project.

Funding

In order to transition from the current situation where seclusion and restraint are used an average of 125 times a day (21,770 times in the 2023-24 school year in Michigan), to a healthier situation where extreme behaviors are prevented by meeting student needs using trauma informed, neuroscience aligned, neurodiversity affirming, collaborative, and effective approaches, the system will require some short term and long term financial support.

 

Short-Term Funding

Provide temporary funding to schools to:

  • Convert seclusion rooms so they may no longer be used for seclusion.

  • Provide adequate sensory gyms and voluntary calming spaces to students.

  • Transition to department approved approaches; tools, materials, training, and support.

Provide temporary funding to the department to:

  • Establish a monitoring, oversight, and enforcement system including creating and maintaining all required tools.

Provide temporary funding for the “Do No Harm” data project

 

Long-Term Funding

Provide funding to schools to maintain the minimum number of support personnel.

Provide long-term funding to maintain the monitoring, oversight, and enforcement system.

Guidance

Require the department to produce detailed guidance and support resources including:

  • List with examples of department approved less restrictive interventions.

  • Example exemplary emergency intervention plans.

  • Definitions of adequate sensory gyms and voluntary calming spaces.

  • Research and evidence surrounding the use of seclusion and restraint.

  • What physical, psychological, and emotional distress looks like and how to respond.

  • Examples of patterns of behavior that pose a substantial risk of creating an emergency.

  • Methods for evaluating risk of harm to determine if there is risk of serious physical injury

Key Identified Personnel

Seclusion and Restraint are dangerous and traumatic practices that can have very serious consequences, including death. Not only is there no evidence that they are effective in reducing problem behaviors, but there is evidence of deteriorated student-teacher relationships, increased behavior problems, and they can be a denial of a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). Repeated use of seclusion and restraint should be viewed as strong evidence of treatment failure.

 

Involuntary seclusion is a form of solitary confinement, depriving children of co-regulation and supportive connection when they need it the most. Solitary confinement has been linked to increased risk of suicide, self-harm, anxiety, depression, mental and physical deterioration, paranoia, aggression, and a significant risk of death. Involuntary seclusion is part of the school to prison pipeline, should not be used on children, and has no place in our public schools.

 

Michigan students have died as the result of being restrained by trained staff and therefore, restraint is a potentially deadly force. Restraint should only be used in dangerous emergencies or life-threatening situations. Extreme effort should be made to prevent dangerous emergencies and life-threatening situations and therefore, the use of restraint in schools should be exceptionally rare.  

​

Because of the extreme risk involved with using emergency seclusion, only highly trained professionals who are up to date with all training required to become a key identified personnel should be allowed to use emergency seclusion, including school resource officers.​​

Prohibit Involuntary Seclusion

Current Michigan law defines emergency seclusion in part as intervention that, "provides an opportunity for the pupil to regain self-control while maintaining the safety of the pupil and others."  The intent of the law is clear, but evidence and research tells us that forcibly removing a child from their educational setting and shutting them in a closet-sided room with nothing to comfort them isn't a trauma-informed way to help students regain self-control. 

 

What does help dysregulated children regain self-control is co-regulation with a calm, caring, and empathetic adult, lowering demands, feeling safe, feeling understood, having their needs met, connection with a trusted person, access to regulating objects or activities (which are sometimes (wrongfully) withheld as part of an (abusive) behavior modification tactic because they are labeled "desired objects or activities"), soft music, fuzzy textures, a chance to throw soft objects, punch a mat, kick a bag, or swing, just to name a few.

 

Involuntary seclusion is a form of solitary confinement, depriving children of co-regulation and supportive connection when they need it the most. Solitary confinement has been linked to increased risk of suicide, self-harm, anxiety, depression, mental and physical deterioration, paranoia, aggression, and a significant risk of death. Involuntary seclusion is part of the school to prison pipeline, should not be used on children, and has no place in our public schools.

​

​Seclusion should be prohibited in Michigan as it has been in several states including Hawaii and Georgia.  â€‹

Defining Restraint Types

Currently, Michigan law prohibits all forms of restraint except emergency physical restraint.  Additionally the policy states that "restraint does not include" and it goes on to list several things, some of which meet the Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) definition of restraint, which makes Michigan policy unclear and confusing.

 

EndSaR recommends that everything that meets the CRDC definition of restraint be called restraint and that we distinguish between lawful and unlawful use of restraint by using the terms "necessary brief-hold restraint," "extended restraint," "gentle escort," "restraint escort," and "full restraint."​​

​

EndSaR recommends that the following not be called restraint because they do not meet the CRDC definition of restraint:

​

Not Restraint:

a. Minimum contact necessary to assist a pupil in completing a task or response if the pupil does not resist or resistance is minimal in intensity or duration;

b. The administration of medication prescribed by and administered in accordance with the directions of a physician;

c. The use of an adaptive or protective device recommended by a physician or therapist when it is used as recommended; 

d. Safety equipment used by the general pupil population as intended, such as a seat belt or safety harness on school transportation.

e. The brief *voluntary, consentual* holding of a pupil in order to calm or comfort *(gentle hug)*;

​​

EndSaR recommends that the following be called Necessary Brief Hold Restraint because they mee the CRDC definition of restraint but are brief:

Necessary Brief Hold Restraint:

a. A brief hold restraint necessary to break up a fight;

b. A brief hold restraint necessary to stop a physical assault, as defined in MCL 380.1310(b);

c. A brief hold restraint necessary to take a weapon from a pupil.

d. A brief hold restraint necessary to prevent an impulsive behavior that threatens the pupil’s immediate safety, such as running in front of a car * or banging their head against a brick wall.*

  • The phrase between * was added for clarity.

​​​

EndSaR recommends that the following be called Gentle Escort because it meets the CRDC definition of physical escort:

Gentle Escort:

b. The minimum *gentle* contact necessary to physically escort a pupil from one area to another;

  • The CRDC definition of "Physical escort" includes a touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder, or back of a student for the purpose of inducing a student to walk to a safe location, when the contact does not continue after arriving at the safe location.

  • EndSaR's recommended definition of "Gentle escort" is the gentle touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder, or back of a student for the purpose of inducing a student to walk to a safe location, when the contact does not continue after arriving at the safe location.​

 

EndSaR recommends that Necessary Brief Hold Restraints be permitted but that the necessary training, documentation, debriefing, parent communication, and Emergency Intervention Plan (EIP) or Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP) be completed because they are restraints.

Prohibit Unnecessary Restraint

Many Michigan parents have described their children being dragged through the hallway, coming home with bruises on their arms, being carried by their hands and feet to a seclusion room, being fully immobilized for laying on the floor in the empty school library, being held to the ground face down, and being told that if they can talk then they can breathe when their child complained of trouble breathing.  

​

Like US Secretary of Education Miguel A. Cardona stated "The use of restraint and seclusion practices is inconsistent with our shared goal to ensure every child is treated with dignity and free from abuse."  

​

While the vast majority of our educators would never use restraint in the ways described above, the truth is that some of our most vulnerable children are having these experiences and they are unnecessary.  

​

In 2017, the Michigan board of education released a policy on the emergency use of seclusion and restraint that clearly defined the situations in which a brief hold would be necessary to break up a fight, stop an assault, prevent a dangerous impulsive behavior like banging their head on a brick wall or running out in front of a car.  This allows educators the ability to us brief hold restraint stop themselves and their students from getting hit by or otherwise hurt by a student.  All other instances of restraint are unnecessary and therefore should be prohibited.​​​

Public and Private Schools

A 2009 Government Accountability Office report titled "Seclusions and Restraints: Selected Cases of Death and Abuse at Public and Private Schools and Treatment Centers" found hundreds of allegations of abuse at public and private schools across the nation between the years 1990 and 2009.

​

In this report, "A 17-year-old boy reportedly died from an asthma attack while being restrained by a counselor at a private school for emotionally disturbed teens" and in a separate case, "Two staff members trained in the use of restraints pinned the student facedown on the floor for 20 minutes after he tried to attack a counselor."  "The student died from a brain injury as a result of a lack of oxygen."  

​

The state of Michigan has a responsibility to protect all of it's children regardless of whether they are attending a public or private school.  Therefore, this policy should apply to all schools.

Research and Evidance

1) “In fact, seclusion and restraint are dangerous and traumatic not only to the individuals subjected to these practices, but also for the staff implementing them.”

“Moreover, some studies indicate that seclusion and restraint use leads to an increase in the behaviors that staff members are attempting to control or eliminate. - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (SAMHSA) Brief #1

​

 

2)”Furthermore, there continues to be no evidence that using restraint or seclusion is effective in reducing the occurrence of the problem behaviors that frequently precipitate the use of such techniques.” – U.S. Department of Education – Restraint and Seclusion: Resource Document

​

​

3) “The forceful assertion of another person’s will over one’s own, along with the loss of control over one’s body and environment, generates very negative emotions and has deep psychological and traumatic impacts on people.” – Strategies to End Seclusion and Restraint: World Health Organization Quality Rights Specialized Training - Topic 3: The Personal Experience and Impact of Seclusion and Restraint

​

 

4) " Irrespective of their racial backgrounds, parents expressed that the trauma associated with their child’s school punishment led them to develop physiological and psychosomatic health challenges, such as depression, hypertension, stroke, peri-traumatic emesis, and other health impairments."

- Suspended, restrained, and secluded: Exploring the relationship between school punishment, disability, and black and white parents’ health outcomes - Dr. Charles Bell & Miltonette Olivia Craig

​

 

5) “A school’s use of restraint or seclusion may have a traumatic impact on a student, such that even if she were never again restrained or secluded, she might nevertheless have new academic or behavioral difficulties that, if not addressed promptly, could constitute a denial of FAPE.” – Fact Sheet: Restraint and Seclusion of Students with Disabilities – U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights

​

 

6) “Repeated use of restraint and seclusion should be viewed as strong evidence of treatment failure"  - Restraint and Seclusion in Public Schools: Ethical Issues, Risks, and How to Protect Children from Adult-Inflicted Harm" Matthew T. Boradhead, Ph.D. and Rebecca Saur-Burns, M.A.

- Michigan State University 

​

 

7) "Placement in solitary confinement has been associated with symptoms of increased psychological distress, such as anxiety, depression, paranoia, and aggression," - The body in isolation: The physical health impacts of incarceration in solitary confinement - Justin D. Strong ad  Keramet Reiter et. al.

​

​

8) "The solutions that will improve the educational system and improve outcomes for students are the same solutions that will eliminate restraint and seclusion in America’s schools." - A Twenty-First Century Approach to Supporting All Students - Beth Tolley

​

​

9) "The practices of restraint and seclusion disproportionately impact children with disabilities, minorities, and boys. Often it is the youngest children that are most frequently secluded and restrained, many of these children as young as 5, 6 and 7 years old. One must accept that these young and often disabled children are exhibiting behaviors that are so dangerous that they could lead to death or serious bodily injury. The use of restraint and seclusion leads to significant trauma in students teachers and staff. Using restraint and seclusion increases the chance of injury and even death." About Seclusion and Restraint - Guy Stephens - Alliance Against Seclusion and Restraint

​​

​

10) "Collaborative & Proactive Solutions (CPS) is the evidence-based, trauma-informed, neurodiversity affirming model of care that helps caregivers focus on identifying the problems that are causing concerning behaviors in kids and solving those problems collaboratively and proactively. The model is a departure from approaches emphasizing the use of consequences to modify concerning behaviors. In families, general and special education schools, inpatient psychiatry units, and residential and juvenile detention facilities, the CPS model has a track record of dramatically improving behavior and dramatically reducing or eliminating discipline referrals, detentions, suspensions, restraints, and seclusions." Where Compassion and Science Intersect - Dr. Ross Greene - Lives in the Balance

​

EndSaR New Logo.png
bottom of page